Notes for the Guidance of Inspectors Holding Inquiries into orders and
Special Road Schemes.
2. Administrative and Legal Background
The Origins of Orders
2.1 Orders are prepared by Government departments or by local authorities.
Those prepared by Government departments are published in draft and not
made until all the statutory processes have been completed. Local authorities
make orders by council resolutions followed by the sealing of them, but
the orders do not take effect unless and until confirmed by the Secretary
of State / NAW. Each order depends on a section or sections of an Act
of Parliament that, in some cases, specifies the criteria against which
the order is to be considered. Inquiries normally become necessary because
of unresolved objections to a proposal. For most types of order, schedules
and regulations under the relevant Act set out the procedures for making
or confirming orders and the circumstances in which a public inquiry is
to be held.
The Statutory Basis for Inquiries into Orders
2.2 Schedule 1 of the Highways Act 1980 and Section 5 of the Acquisition
of Land Act 1981 give the Secretary of State / NAW powers to hold inquiries
in relation to matters arising under those Acts. Schedule 1 Paragraph
7 of the Highways Act specifies cases where an inquiry is required into
line orders and side road orders. Section 13 of the Acquisition of Land
Act (as to local authority orders) and Schedule 1, Paragraph 4, of that
Act (as to the Secretary of State’s / NAW's draft orders) specify
cases where an inquiry or hearing is required in relation to CPOs. Section
252(4) and Schedule 14, Paragraph 3, of the Town and Country Planning
Act 1990 detail the circumstances under which a public inquiry should
take place for orders under Sections 247, 248, 249 and 251 of that Act.
Section 3(5)(b) of the Cycle Tracks Act 1984 provides for regulations
enabling the Secretary of State to hold inquiries into opposed Cycle Track
Orders.
2.3 Inquiries into orders to which these notes relate are often expressed
as being inquiries into objections or to hear representations and objections.
However, the task of the Inspector is to inquire into the order in the
light of the objections. Objectors at an inquiry may seek to show that
the proposals are ill conceived. If they do, and unless there are cogent
reasons for adopting a different procedure, the authority which prepared
the order must explain its proposals and say why they are considered to
be expedient. This provides both the background against which the various
objections can be considered in detail and the basis on which a recommendation
can be made on the order as a whole.
2.4 Although inquiries are convened because of unresolved objections,
the scope of the inquiry can be wider. For example, in the case of inquiries
into CPOs (see ODPM Circular 06/2004 for further details) an Inspector
is required not only to deal with the objections to the order, but he
or she must also satisfy himself or herself that:
- there is a compelling case for acquisition in the public interest;
this justifies interfering with the human rights of those with an interest
in the land affected;
- the acquiring authority has a clear idea of how it is intending to
use the land it seeks to acquire;
- the acquiring authority can show that all necessary resources to
carry out its plans are likely to be available within a reasonable timescale;
- the scheme is unlikely to be blocked by any impediment to implementation.
Section 248 of the Highways Act refers to the limited circumstances in
which land may be acquired where the land is not immediately required.
When considering the amount of land incorporated in the order, the Inspector
should give due regard not only to the area of land, but also to the estate
or interest proposed to be taken in it. For example, it may well be argued
that an order providing for the acquisition of title to the land is excessive
because all that is required is for a right to be created under Section
250 of the Highways Act and for that right to be acquired under the CPO.
The Inquiries Procedure Rules
2.5 All inquiries concerned with orders and schemes proposed to be made
under the Highways Act 1980 are subject to Inquiries Procedure Rules.
The current rules of procedure under this Act are:
- The Highways (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1994 - Statutory Instrument
1994 No 3263 - which apply to inquiries concerned with orders either:
- proposed to be made by the Secretary of State / NAW), or
- made by a local highway authority and submitted to the Secretary
of State / NAW for confirmation.
- The Compulsory Purchase by Ministers (Inquiries Procedure) Rules
1994 - Statutory Instrument 1994 No 3264 - which apply to CPOs published
in draft by the Secretary of State / NAW under the Highways Act.
- The Compulsory Purchase by Non-Ministerial Acquiring Authorities
(Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1990 - Statutory Instrument 1990 No 512
- which apply to CPOs made by local authorities under the Highways Act
and submitted to the Secretary of State / NAW for confirmation.
2.6 All inquiries are subject to the rules of natural justice and must
be conducted with openness, fairness and impartiality; the various Inquiries
Procedure Rules are based on these principles. The rules give only certain
classes of objector an express right to appear at an inquiry: generally
statutory bodies and individuals directly affected by a proposal. An Inspector
has the power to refuse to hear anyone who has no real standing in the
matter and who is simply intent on delaying or disrupting the proceedings.
Nevertheless it is important that the Inspector should afford the opportunity
to speak to anyone wanting to appear at the inquiry who has something
relevant to say which is not merely repetitious or obstructive. The rules
provide a framework within which the Inspector is able to exercise considerable
discretion, having taken into account the views of the parties who are
present at the inquiry.
2.7 Where there are no rules applicable to a particular inquiry, the Inspector
should normally follow the Highways (Inquiries Procedure) Rules 1994 as
far as possible. However, in situations where an inquiry has been set
up to hear objections which have been made within an advertised formal
deposit period (that have been “duly-made”) and there is no
scope to hear representations from people who did not lodge their objections
within the formal deposit period, Inspectors should follow the guidance
of paragraphs 7.6 and 7.7. The Inspector should make clear the procedure
to be followed at the opening of the inquiry so that everyone will know
what to expect.
Revised November 2004
|