The Planning Inspectorate

Appeals & Other Casework


Planning Appeals
Enforcement Appeals
Common Land
Highways and Transport
Local Development Frameworks
Regional Spatial Strategy
Rights of Way
All types of Appeal / Casework
General Information

Complaints

Employment
FAQS
Forms
Freedom of Information
Newsletter
Press Releases and Notices
Publications
Related sites
Site Help
Statistics
Targets
Who's Who

Site Settings

You are currently viewing information for England.

View information for Wales

Modified: 20-Mar-2008

Listed Building and Conservation Area Enforcement HC Challenge Leaflet

Right to Challenge the Listed Building or Conservation Area Enforcement Appeal Decision

The attached appeal decision is final unless it is successfully challenged in the Courts on a point of law. If a challenge is successful the case will be returned to the Secretary of State by the Court for re-determination. However, if it is re-determined, it does not necessarily follow that the original decision on the appeal will be reversed.

Depending on the circumstances, an appeal may be made to the High Court under either or both sections 65 and 63 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. There are differences between the two sections, including different time limits, which may affect your choice of which to use. These are outlined below.

You may wish to consider taking legal advice before embarking on a challenge. The following notes are provided for guidance only.

Challenges under Section 65

Section 65 provides that the appellant, the local planning authority or any person having an interest Footnote 1 in the land to which the enforcement notice relates may appeal to the High Court against the decision on a point of law.

An appeal under section 65 may only proceed with the leave (permission) of the Court. An application for leave to appeal must be made to the Court within 28 days of the date of the appeal decision, unless the period is extended by the Court.

If you are not the appellant, the local planning authority or a person with an interest in the land but you want to challenge an enforcement appeal decision on grounds (a) to (d) or (f) to (k), or the decision to quash the notice, you may make an application for judicial review. You should seek legal advice promptly if you wish to use this non-statutory procedure.

Challenges under Section 63 of the 1990 Act

Decisions on appeals made under section 20 (listed building consent) may be challenged under this section. Section 63 also relates to enforcement appeals, but only to decisions granting listed building or conservation area consent or discharging conditions. Success under section 63 alone would not alter any other aspect of an enforcement appeal decision. The enforcement notice would remain quashed unless successfully challenged under section 65 or by judicial review.

Section 63 provides that a person who is aggrieved by the decision to grant listed building or conservation area consent or discharge conditions (on an enforcement appeal) or by any decision on an associated appeal under s20 of the Act, may question the validity of that decision by an application to the High Court on the grounds that:-

  1. the decision is not within the powers of the Act; or
  2. any of the 'relevant requirements' have not been complied with ('relevant requirements' means any requirements of the 1990 Act or of the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1992, or of any order, regulation or rule made under either Act).

These two grounds mean in effect that a decision cannot be challenged merely because someone does not agree with an Inspector's judgement. Those challenging a decision have to be able to show that a serious mistake was made by that Inspector when reaching his or her decision; or, for instance, that the inquiry, hearing or site visit was not handled correctly, or that the appeal procedures were not carried out properly. If a mistake has been made the Court may decide not to quash the decision if the interests of the person making the challenge have not been prejudiced.

Please note that under section 63 an application to the High Court must be lodged with the Crown Office within 6 weeks of the date of the accompanying decision letter. This time limit cannot be extended. Leave of the High Court is not required for this type of challenge.

Advice

If you require further advice on making a High Court challenge you should consult a solicitor or other advisor or contact the Crown Office at the Royal Courts of Justice, Queens Bench Division, Strand, London, WC2 2LL. Telephone: 0171 936 6000.

Inspection of Documents

In an inquiry case, any person who is entitled to be notified of the decision has a statutory right to view the listed documents, photographs and plans within 6 weeks of the date of the decision letter. Other requests to see appeal documents are not normally refused but please note that our appeal files are usually destroyed one year after the decision is issued. Please make your request to Room 4/09 Kite Wing, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Temple Quay, Bristol, BS1 6PN, quoting the Inspectorate's appeal reference and stating the day and time you wish to visit. Give at least 3 days' notice and include a daytime telephone number, if possible.

Complaints to the Inspectorate

You can make a written complaint about the decision letter, or about the way in which the Inspector has conducted the case, or any procedural aspect of the appeal to:

The Planning Inspectorate
Quality Assurance Unit
4/09 Kite Wing
Temple Quay House
2 The Square
Temple Quay
Bristol
BS1 6PN

Telephone: 0117 372 6372
Fax: 0117 372 8139
Email: complaints@planning-inspectorate.gsi.gov.uk

Quoting the Inspectorate's appeal reference. We aim to send you a full reply within 15 days of receipt of your letter. Please note that, once the decision has been issued, we cannot reconsider any appeal or the decision. This can be done only following a successful High Court challenge as explained in this leaflet.

Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (the Ombudsman)

If you consider that you have been unfairly treated through maladministration on the part of the Inspectorate or the Inspector you can ask the Ombudsman to investigate. The Ombudsman cannot be approached directly; only an MP can pass on your request. In most cases, your local MP may be the easiest to contact (their name and address is listed at the local library) although you may approach another MP if you prefer. Although the Ombudsman can recommend various forms of redress he cannot alter the appeal decision in any way.

Administrative Justice & Tribunals Council

If you feel there was something wrong with the basic procedure used for the appeal, you can make a complaint to the ‘Administrative Justice & Tribunals Council, 81 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1BQ. The Council will take the matter up if they think it comes within their scope. They are not concerned with the merits of the appeal and cannot change the outcome of the appeal decision.

1. To have an interest in the land means essentially to own, part own, lease and in some cases, occupy the site.