Definitive Map Orders: Consistency Guidelines
Annex 1 - Letter from the Head of the Countryside Division
DETR
ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT
REGIONS
ROOM 917
TOLLGATE HOUSE
HOULTON STREET
BRISTOL BS2 9DJ
24-AUGUST 1998
Dear Chief Executive,
UNCLASSIFIED COUNTY ROADS
1. This letter is to advise you of the conclusions reached by Department
of the Environment, Transport and the Regions on the interpretation of
the term "unclassified county road" (UCR). This advice replaces
previous advice, usually given in response to specific enquiries rather
than a general statement, which was withdrawn in March 1998.
2. We have reached the following conclusions (with the usual proviso
that the Secretary of State cannot give an authoritative interpretation
of the law as only the Courts can do that) :
i) The Highways Act 1980 places a duty on highway authorities to maintain highways, which includes footpaths, bridleways and carriageways. Highway authorities have a further duty under section 36(6) of the Highways Act 1980 (and earlier Highways Acts) to prepare a list of highways maintained at public expense.
ii) The Local Government Act 1929 made provision for "unclassified roads", "classified county roads" and "county roads". The term "unclassified road" was made redundant by the Local Government Act 1972. Some routes may, however, be described as unclassified county roads (UCRs) on certain documents, including the list of highways maintained at public expense.
iii) In relation to an application under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 to add a route to a definitive map of rights of way, the inclusion of a highway described as a UCR on the Highways Act list of highways maintained at public expense may provide evidence of vehicular rights. However, this must be considered with all other relevant evidence in order to determine the nature and extent of those rights.
iv) It would, therefore, be possible for a way described as a UCR on
a list prepared under the 1980 Act, or elsewhere, to be added to a definitive
map of public rights of way, provided the route fulfils the criteria
set out in Part III of the Wildlife and Countryside Act.
3. Against this background, we have concluded that we cannot offer any
guidance which is applicable in all cases on the rights that exist over
routes known as UCRs. Any questions about the status of such routes,
and the rights that exist over, will need to be resolved by authorities
on a case-by-case basis.
SUSAN CARTER
April 2003