The Planning Inspectorate normally carries out an annual customer satisfaction survey, and until recently this covered a separate area of work each year. In 2000-01 we surveyed customer satisfaction with our performance in handling development plan inquiries, and in 2001-02 the survey covered our work on rights of way cases.

For 2002-03, one of the Inspectorate’s key targets was to survey customer satisfaction with the Inspectorate’s performance overall.

The survey, which is following a three-year programme, will cover all of the Inspectorate’s main business areas. As in 2002-03, for 2003-04 we have focused on:

Planning appeals under s78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Enforcement appeals under s174 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Development Plans
Rights of Way appeals
Advertisement appeals
Call-in cases

The survey examined customer satisfaction with the inspectorate in these business areas, from first contact through to attendance at inquiries, the decision or report stage itself, and any subsequent involvement with us. In addition, the survey explored customer satisfaction and views on:

Electronic working
The handling of complaints
The role of the InspectorateCustomer Support Unit
Welsh aspects of the Inspectorate business

The three-year approach

Conducting the survey over three years offers a number of advantages. These include:

tracking satisfaction over the three-year period, with the option of repeating certain core questions to monitor progress
flexibility to cover different areas of the inspectorate's business and services provided over the three year period, with scope to add and remove questions in each year
assessing the progress and effectiveness of improvements recommended by the study

To help ensure continuity, we have asked Faber Maunsell to continue working with the Inspectorate in carrying out the 2004-05 survey.

Sampling and Methodology

Following database analysis, the study team drew a random sample of 5000 customers involved in planning appeals, rights of way cases, call-in cases, advertisement appeals and development plan inquiries during the year.

Following a pilot survey, researchers conducted a postal survey of the customers selected in the sample, followed by a telephone survey for people who had not responded initially. A total of 1607 customers returned the questionnaire (a 32% response rate). The consultants also carried out a number of in-depth interviews with a range of customers, including both focus groups and one-to-one interviews, to help scope the survey and to provide qualitative as well as quantitative analysis, including an interview with the Advisory Panel on Standards (APOS). This emphasis on qualitative analysis is a distinguishing mark of the new survey approach.

Survey results

The survey results showed that seventy-four per cent of respondents were either satisfied or very satisfied with the performance of the Inspectorate overall, compared with sixty-six per cent in 2002-03. The main findings of the survey were that:

Satisfaction levels were generally high (70-80% on average) across all the Inspectorate’s business streams and services.
There was a very high level of satisfaction with Inspectors and administrative staff. Over 80% of respondents were satisfied with their contacts with both, particularly for courtesy and helpfulness.

There were no significant differences in survey responses from customers in Wales, who were asked the same questions as in England.

Next steps

Having considered the report’s findings, the Inspectorate will now be taking action on areas where it can continue to help speed the planning process and further improve the quality of its work. We have asked Faber Maunsell to assist with this by establishing a customer panel to assist with further qualitative research and to help increase awareness of the work we are carrying out, as part of the 2004-05 survey process.

Proposed actions

Proposed actions include the inspectorate's involvement in focus groups/workshops with customers, facilitated by our consultants, as part of the 2004-05 survey, including the customer panel described above. Among other things, the groups may be asked to consider the perceived role of the inspectorate, the constraints faced by the various parties involved in the planning process, and whether measures may already be planned that will address the issues that customers have raised in response to the study. We will also ask the consultants to help consider the causes of any perceived delay and possible ways to reduce it in some types of casework. Attention will also be given to the guidance given to Inspectors, office staff and to customers themselves to ensure that any areas of concern identified in the study are dealt with appropriately.

Conclusion

The results of the survey are very welcome for the Inspectorate. There is a high level of overall satisfaction with our work, and there continues to be a good perception of the Inspectorate generally, including both the work of Inspectors themselves and the work carried out by administrators at Temple Quay House.

Once again, we would like to offer our thanks to the many people who took part in the survey.

The 2003-04 survey was arranged and project-managed by an Inspectorate team consisting of Malcolm Brady, David Halstead and Jane Huntbach. Jeremy Hardin was lead consultant for Faber Maunsell.

(April 2004)

Download the Customer Survey Report in 2003 - 2004 in PDF Format 391kb

How to view PDF documents

PDF files can be viewed using Adobe's Acrobat Reader. You can download Acrobat Reader free of charge from the Adobe website. Visit Access Adobe to find out how people with visual disabilities can get the most from this software.